Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

searching on gene name #714

Open
ValWood opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

searching on gene name #714

ValWood opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented Feb 2, 2024

Historically
I used to search on gene name for pombe and I always used to find the entity. These days, as more species are added I never can, because it's beneath the bottom of the list and there is no way to alter my search to improve the specificity:

Screenshot 2024-02-01 at 16 23 03

Is there any way to either
a) prioritise the core model species
b) make the results list longer and scrollable
c) ideally always qualify by species, or you have no hope of finding what you need based on just the gene name and the uniprot ID

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented Feb 2, 2024

Yes, this is an increasing annoyance and is on our radar. While we try and get back to backend work, I can offer a couple of workarounds:

Pre-pinned gene product search (RECOMMENDED)

If you're looking for gene products for your species, the "general" search on the landing page can get noisy. You can also go straight to a gp search for your organism at:

https://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/search/bioentity?q=*:*&fq=taxon_subset_closure_label:%22Schizosaccharomyces%20pombe%22&sfq=document_category:%22bioentity%22

Weird thing that works, but I'm not sure why (NOT RECOMMENDED)

On the landing page, you can type:

pcm1 Pom <- note the cap "P" in "Pom"

The search isn't supposed to be sensitive like this, especially not here, but is does seem to give the "correct" result for some reason.

@ValWood
Copy link
Author

ValWood commented Feb 3, 2024

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants