Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dataset categories - curation before uploading first vocabulary version #115

Open
CecSve opened this issue Jun 16, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
content Label for issue concerning vocabulary content enhancement New feature or request occurrence

Comments

@CecSve
Copy link
Collaborator

CecSve commented Jun 16, 2022

TO BE ADDED

Based on the suggestion here: gbif/registry#247

This is currently not a feature on GBIF.org and therefore has no verbatim values.


Here is a file to edit:

It contains:

  • the list of existing concepts
  • a list of the values already mapped to the concepts (they are all in the Hidden sheet/tab for now
  • the GBIF verbatim values for this field that appear more than 10,000 times or in 5 or more datasets

Please check instructions here: #70

@CecSve CecSve added enhancement New feature or request content Label for issue concerning vocabulary content occurrence labels Jun 16, 2022
@CecSve
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CecSve commented Jun 16, 2022

Please be aware of the difference between dataset category and methods (for subcategories): gbif/registry#247 (comment)

@CecSve
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CecSve commented Oct 7, 2022

Considerations relevant for dataset categories.

E.g. machine based observations (individual tracking data):

As an example, it is natural to organise machine detections of tagged individuals as sample events, but these samples are of tagged individuals and not of local biodiversity - importing these data as sample events in GBIF/ALA implies suitability for purposes they cannot support.

Categories in terms of relevance:

Note that it might be appropriate for GBIF and other aggregators to offer separate views, with different data commitments, for use in biodiversity monitoring and e.g. for use as a global virtual natural history collection.

@CecSve
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CecSve commented Apr 9, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Label for issue concerning vocabulary content enhancement New feature or request occurrence
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant