Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement richness maps #23

Open
timrobertson100 opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Implement richness maps #23

timrobertson100 opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@timrobertson100
Copy link
Member

GBIF wish to surface species richness maps whereby for 1 degree, 0.5 degree, 0.1 degree cells (at a minimum) we can render densities. In particular these would be useful for genus/family and higher taxa species pages. The species richeness should count species (not terminal taxa).

SOLR is not going to be fast enough to do this on the fly (in it's current schema at least) so I think this needs to be preprocessed.

It might be useful to consider if this can be done generically to add (e.g.) dataset richness, although that is a far lower priority.

@jhnwllr
Copy link

jhnwllr commented Sep 28, 2018

I think this would make the maps api really really powerful.

I wrote a shiny app with some ideas that might be interesting to implement. I just leave it here as reference.

shiny io app

Probably if everything has to be pre-rendered it limits what can be done, but any richness maps service would be great.

@timrobertson100
Copy link
Member Author

Looks very nice @jhnwllr
We would need to preprocess some views, but perhaps not all.

Are those 350km, 400km etc true areas, or are they approximate grids based on lat/lng in WGS84 please? e.g. is 100km really meaning "1 degree cells"?

@jhnwllr
Copy link

jhnwllr commented Sep 28, 2018

It is 100km is equal to 1 degree cells. There is some distortion and overlap moving away from the equator. Circles look prettier than ovals :). Some distorted square grid would I guess be more accurate.

@timrobertson100
Copy link
Member Author

timrobertson100 commented Sep 28, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants