You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the first mocks for the hosted portal was to have filtering for "fitness". But so far hasn't progressed it.
We have called it many things, such as Fitness for use, quality, issues and flags, but the idea is the same: giving users a type of filters to find the records the look for in terms of the type of data and quality/attributes of the data. From what I understand it is things like:
is sequenced
is eDNA
is citizen science
is sampling data
is tracking data
has images
gridded data
and all our issue flags, but probably as excludes (e.g. exclude records with date issues)
Is this still interesting and is it worth prioritising?
And if so what kind of filters/profiles would be intersting?
One of the first mocks for the hosted portal was to have filtering for "fitness". But so far hasn't progressed it.
We have called it many things, such as
Fitness for use
,quality
,issues and flags
, but the idea is the same: giving users a type of filters to find the records the look for in terms of the type of data and quality/attributes of the data. From what I understand it is things like:Is this still interesting and is it worth prioritising?
And if so what kind of filters/profiles would be intersting?
https://labs.gbif.org/visual-concepts/_images/portals/0.jpg (5 year old mockup!)
https://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrence/search?q=*%3A*&qualityProfile=ALA&disableQualityFilter=occurrence-status
Related issues: gbif/pipelines#350, gbif/registry#247
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: