Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Licensee Code → Extended Licensee Code #434

Open
avivace opened this issue Sep 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

New Licensee Code → Extended Licensee Code #434

avivace opened this issue Sep 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
consistency - style Content format, text style, consistency in presenting the informations

Comments

@avivace
Copy link
Sponsor Member

avivace commented Sep 17, 2022

I'd like to change the name "New Licensee Code" to "Extended Licensee Code". I think it better conveys the idea of a revision of the system, instead of focusing on the fact that it came out afterwards

@ISSOtm ISSOtm changed the title New Licensee Code -> Extended Lincesee Code New Licensee Code -> Extended Licensee Code Sep 17, 2022
@ISSOtm ISSOtm changed the title New Licensee Code -> Extended Licensee Code New Licensee Code → Extended Licensee Code Sep 17, 2022
@nitro2k01
Copy link
Member

Why?

  1. It's a literal description of events. It's in fact a new standard for specifying the licensee, meant to replace the old one.
  2. In what sense is it extended? It doesn't encode any additional information, since the old field is supposed to have a placeholder value. It also doesn't contain more information than the old field would have, since it ultimately encodes a number between 0 and 255 just like the old field, despite being spread out over 2 bytes.

@pinobatch
Copy link
Member

I seem to remember reading somewhere that new licensee codes were allowed to use letters G through Z in addition to hexadecimal digits 0 through F.

@nitro2k01
Copy link
Member

I seem to remember reading somewhere that new licensee codes were allowed to use letters G through Z in addition to hexadecimal digits 0 through F.

I'm doing some statistical analysis of the ROMs in GoodGBX and this is true. Will return later with more information as I find things out.

@avivace avivace added the consistency - style Content format, text style, consistency in presenting the informations label Apr 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
consistency - style Content format, text style, consistency in presenting the informations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants