You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I use SDXL Turbo with the configurations you provided I get good results. for example:
But when I try using other models the results seems bad, including SDXL (not turbo). Here are the relevant code I used:
I believe it is a matter of specific configurations each model has. I tried to modify the configurations according to the appendix as you can see, but it still did not work. Here is the result:
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We focused on fast diffusion models in the paper, so I didn't try to edit images in that naive way using SDXL.
I wasn't able to reproduce the same result you sent but I also got a bad result:
You can solve this by increasing the CFG, in the example is 1.0. For example with CFG=1.5:
And with CFG=2.0:
Let me know if that doesn't work for you, the only change I made in the inversion_example_sdxl.py is to change the prompt and CFG value when calling pipe_inference.
Great work!
When I use SDXL Turbo with the configurations you provided I get good results. for example:
But when I try using other models the results seems bad, including SDXL (not turbo). Here are the relevant code I used:
I believe it is a matter of specific configurations each model has. I tried to modify the configurations according to the appendix as you can see, but it still did not work. Here is the result:
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: