Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coherent handling of metadata for the IRF classes #5223

Open
bkhelifi opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Coherent handling of metadata for the IRF classes #5223

bkhelifi opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@bkhelifi
Copy link
Member

bkhelifi commented Apr 19, 2024

Currently the IRF classes have a meta dictionary. One should introduce a pydantic handling of the metadata,

@AtreyeeS
Copy link
Member

AtreyeeS commented May 2, 2024

What meta information should the IRF classes have? The DL4 classes created by Gammapy can have the Creation info. They can also store info of the type of DL3 products they were created from (eg: the HDUCLAS options), but isn't it more of provenance info?

@bkhelifi
Copy link
Member Author

bkhelifi commented May 2, 2024

One has: the fixity, the context, maybe the simulation configuration or te provenance. Depending if the IRFs are stored into a single file, or into several files, the metadata can be spread.
When correctly read, these metada can be handled (ie reduced) for the DL4 products.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants