Split the frequenz.sdk.actor
package to its own repository
#851
Labels
part:actor
Affects an actor ot the actors utilities (decorator, etc.)
priority:high
Address this as soon as possible
scope:breaking-change
Breaking change, users will need to update their code
type:enhancement
New feature or enhancement visitble to users
Milestone
What's needed?
We need to allow cloud applications to be able to write actors without depending on the microgrid.
Proposed solution
Split the
frequenz.sdk.actor
package to its own repository:See which namespace would be possible to use for the new python package:We can use thefrequenz.actor
would be the natural choice, but it is still a namespace for the many actor packages.frequenz.actor.core
orfrequenz.actor.base
might be some options, although not that clear. Keepingfrequenz.sdk.actor
could be another option, but we need to see if it doesn't conflict withfrequenz.sdk
living in another package too. Another alternative could befrequenz.actors
(in plural, as we already have withchannels
), but that might be a bit confusing that we have bothfrequenz.actor
andfrequenz.actors
packages.frequenz.actor
package.frequenz-actor-python
and move the code thereUse cases
All the cloud apps.
Alternatives and workarounds
For now we've been copying protobuf files from the common API repo to the API repos that should depend on common to break the dependency, but this is clearly not sustainable.
Additional context
This is a very complicated, multi-dimensional, problem, involving many parts. Is part (and one way) to solve the dependency conflict of the SDK depending on the microgrid API v0.15 (and common v0.4) and the new API clients depending on common v0.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: