Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi-Purpose Trust Network #458

Open
sanity opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Multi-Purpose Trust Network #458

sanity opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
A-decentralized-services Area: services built on top of the Locutus network C-feature Category: New feature or request Draft

Comments

@sanity
Copy link
Collaborator

sanity commented Jan 13, 2023

A decentralized web of trust system that can accommodate many different types of trust relationship, including but not limited to:

  • I trust this identity not to send spam
  • I trust that this identity belongs to this person
  • I trust that this compute node will accurately perform a requested computation
@sanity sanity added C-feature Category: New feature or request A-decentralized-services Area: services built on top of the Locutus network Draft labels Jan 13, 2023
@planetoryd
Copy link

planetoryd commented Apr 28, 2023

I think this brings marginal benefit. Web-of-trust is not that useful, especially when used alone. A mechanism to encourage cooperation/compliance should increase the stake, raising the cost of bad behavior.

Biological identities and the permanent loss of reputation is one thousand times more substantial than web-of-trust on an (semi) anon network.

Therefore, tokenomics-based solutions are an great improvement as they can create precisely-priced, massive stakes, usable in an anonymous setup.

WoT with small stakes can only do small things, basic prevention of DDoS and such. It's not worth spending too much time on this.

It's more like a means to exploit existing information to maximally slash malicious nodes' reputation. It works when there is large amounts of information available, which isn't present in Locutus and it shouldn't be, for anonymity/privacy purposes.

Partly It's a shared ban-list, while in a centralized situation there is a single source of truth for ban-list, since claims by other nodes are subject to doubt.

In a reddit like social network with pseudo-anonymous identities WoT performs fine. It needs niche cryptography in cases where identities are completely ephemeral and anonymous

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-decentralized-services Area: services built on top of the Locutus network C-feature Category: New feature or request Draft
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants