Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wish for more fine-grained options #97

Open
2 of 3 tasks
Jellby opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #99
Open
2 of 3 tasks

Wish for more fine-grained options #97

Jellby opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #99
Labels
Discussion enhancement Enhancement to existing feature

Comments

@Jellby
Copy link

Jellby commented Feb 1, 2021

  • I'd like spaces after commas in declarations, but not in arguments of procedure definition or call, or in array indices. Fixes and new options #99
  • I'd like indenting blocks, but not the first level (e.g. if a file contains just a subroutine, I don't need all lines indented). Fixes and new options #99
  • I'd lke spaces in if (...) and end foo, but not in write(...) or close(...).

I know one can't please everyonev, but maybe some of these could be considered :)

EDIT: I added check boxes and references to pull requests to keep track of the progress.

@Jellby
Copy link
Author

Jellby commented Feb 1, 2021

Some more suggestions:

  • Ensure () are present calls and subroutine definitions with no arguments: call foo -> call foo()
  • Change the case of in, out, inout values for intent.

EDIT: I added check boxes to keep track of the progress.

@pseewald pseewald linked a pull request Aug 30, 2022 that will close this issue
@pseewald pseewald added enhancement Enhancement to existing feature Discussion labels Aug 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion enhancement Enhancement to existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants