Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flaky Test: AssertionError for TestParallelMatcher#testParallelSlowLog #191

Open
Alisha-0321 opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@Alisha-0321
Copy link

When I ran the test uk.co.flax.luwak.matchers.TestParallelMatcher#testParallelSlowLog using the command mvn test -pl luwak –Dtest=uk.co.flax.luwak.matchers.TestParallelMatcher#testParallelSlowLog, I observed a test failure like the following:

Running uk.co.flax.luwak.matchers.TestParallelMatcher
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.007 sec <<< FAILURE!
testParallelSlowLog(uk.co.flax.luwak.matchers.TestParallelMatcher)  Time elapsed: 0.951 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError:
Expecting:
 <"Limit: 0
        1 [253931520ns]
        2 [2503096ns]
        3 [253931253ns]
">
not to contain:
 <"2 [">
        at uk.co.flax.luwak.matchers.ConcurrentMatcherTestBase.testParallelSlowLog(ConcurrentMatcherTestBase.java:118)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:242)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:137)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
        at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)

Results :
Failed tests:   testParallelSlowLog(uk.co.flax.luwak.matchers.TestParallelMatcher): (..)

Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

I noticed this test failure is flaky, because this test failed 3 times out of 5000 times I ran that same command. I ran the test on an Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS machine using OpenJDK 1.8.0_312.

Also, I found that if I were to insert a 100ms delay right before Line 476 in the file luwak/src/main/java/uk/co/flax/luwak/Monitor.java (through adding a Thread.sleep(100);), I could reproduce the same failure more reliably, almost every time I ran the test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant