Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need alternative to pn_messenger #272

Open
fquinner opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Need alternative to pn_messenger #272

fquinner opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@fquinner
Copy link
Collaborator

fquinner commented May 3, 2017

The pn_messenger interface in Qpid Procon has been marked as deprecated. We need to consider alternatives. I have kicked off a conversation on the qpid proton mailing list to discuss - leaving this open to implement its findings:

http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Alternatives-to-pn-messenger-QPID-Proton-C-td7662766.html

@btorpey
Copy link

btorpey commented Jun 21, 2017

Just a comment from the peanut gallery -- but why not abandon qpid in favor of something like, say, 0mq?

The performance of qpid is quite awful, and it doesn't appear to have much in the way of "legs" -- at least as far as the audience for OpenMAMA is concerned.

By contrast, 0mq is relatively mature, stable, and at least has the potential to perform much better.

(I'm aware of the 0mq bridge that Frank has done, and it looks quite promising -- although I'm thinking it could use a little love, which it would presumably get if it were officially adopted by the OpenMAMA project).

@fquinner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If we stick with qpid proton, we should move messenger API to:

https://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-proton-0.30.0/proton/c/api/group__proactor.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants