You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Under each parent type, the type filter lists the type associated with that parent as well as any children types. Often, when the tree is showing limited results (e.g. "Only on map"), many parent types are shown with themselves as their only child. For example, in the screenshot below, Juglans regia is the only child of Juglans regia. In these cases, the parent does not need to be expandable and could stand in for its associated type. However, it is not clear then if (de)selecting a parent should select/deselect the parent and all of its children (the current behavior) or the parent and only the children currently shown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this can be implemented through the behaviour of culling parents of single children in the tree, for example here, "Wild garlic" being under "Onion" was confusing.
Under each parent type, the type filter lists the type associated with that parent as well as any children types. Often, when the tree is showing limited results (e.g. "Only on map"), many parent types are shown with themselves as their only child. For example, in the screenshot below, Juglans regia is the only child of Juglans regia. In these cases, the parent does not need to be expandable and could stand in for its associated type. However, it is not clear then if (de)selecting a parent should select/deselect the parent and all of its children (the current behavior) or the parent and only the children currently shown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: