Understanding complements and SpaCy's dependency analysis

[johnosbb]

I am trying to understand SpaCy's analysis of "Complements" in sample sentences. Consider the following sentence:

Most students have found her reasonably helpful.

Text	Index	POS	Tag	Dep	Dep Detail	Ancestors	Children	Token Head	Sub Tree
Most	0	ADJ	JJS	amod	adjectival modifier	students found		students	Most
students	1	NOUN	NNS	nsubj	nominal subject	found	Most	found	Most students
have	2	AUX	VBP	aux	auxiliary	found		found	have
found	3	VERB	VBN	ROOT	root		students have helpful .	found	Most students have found her reasonably helpful .
her	4	PRON	PRP	nsubj	nominal subject	helpful found		helpful	her
reasonably	5	ADV	RB	advmod	adverbial modifier	helpful found		helpful	reasonably
helpful	6	ADJ	JJ	ccomp	clausal complement	found	her reasonably	found	her reasonably helpful
.	7	PUNCT	.	punct	punctuation	found		found	.

This is cited here as an example of an SVOC - complex-transitive clause.

The dependency graph is as follows:

I am trying to understand why SpaCy does not identify "her" as having a dependency of "dobj". I assume that SpaCy is regarding "her reasonably helpful" as a clausal complement of the verb "found" and that this clause is serving as the object complement of that verb.
Continuing on the topic of "complements" and "direct objects". The following sentence:

She painted the room blue.

Text	Index	POS	Tag	Dep	Dep Detail	Ancestors	Children	Token Head	Sub Tree
She	0	PRON	PRP	nsubj	nominal subject	painted		painted	She
painted	1	VERB	VBD	ROOT	root		She blue .	painted	She painted the room blue .
the	2	DET	DT	det	determiner	blue painted		blue	the
room	3	NOUN	NN	compound	compound	blue painted		blue	room
blue	4	ADJ	JJ	dobj	direct object	painted	the room	painted	the room blue
.	5	PUNCT	.	punct	punctuation	painted		painted	.

Is the "room" not receiving the action (dobj) and is "blue" not an object complement? What in SpaCy's analysis would indicate the presence of a complement?