Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apparatus entry with <del>, <add>, <subst> #152

Open
AnninaGili opened this issue Mar 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

apparatus entry with <del>, <add>, <subst> #152

AnninaGili opened this issue Mar 5, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@AnninaGili
Copy link

AnninaGili commented Mar 5, 2023

When the apparatus contains the elements <del> and <add>, their content is not showed correctly in EVT 2 apparatus. For examples, given the apparatus

<app>
                        <lem wit="#R #K #Y #T #Q #I #O #S #E #N #H #M #L #P #D">et</lem>
                        <rdg wit="#A">
                            <add>et</add>
                        </rdg>
                    </app>accessiones<app>
                        <lem wit="#R #K #Y #T #Q #I #O #S #N #H #A #L #D #E #M"/>
                        <rdg wit="#P">
                            <del>autem</del>
                        </rdg>
                    </app>

EVT 2 shows what can be seen in the attached screen: the reader cannot understand that A has added et, nor that P has written autem and then deleted it. Moreover, it is not correct to say that the other manuscripts have omitted something: their reading is the correct one.
What I would like to obtain in the apparatus, is the following:
a) when cliking on b], "et post add. A", or on c] "autem post del. P", without reference to the omission of the other codex
b) another possibility would be to connect the text to what preceds in the following way:
rubori ] et post add. A
accessiones ] autem post del. P

The same issue occurs when <del> and <add> are inside the element <subst>, as in the following case, again visible in the screen attached:

totum corpus<app>
                        <lem wit="#R #Y #I #S #N #M #A #L #P #D">pertinet rubori</lem>
                        <rdg wit="#E">pertinet ruboris</rdg>
                        <rdg wit="#O"><subst>
                                <del>pertinet ruboris</del>
                                <add>pertinet rubori</add>
                            </subst></rdg>
                        <rdg wit="#Q #T">pertinent rubori</rdg>
                        <rdg wit="#K">rubori pertinet</rdg>
                    </app>

In this case, what I would like to obtain would be:

pertinet rubori ] pertinet ruboris in pertinet rubori corr. O

Many thanks for you help!
Anna Gili
issuesETV

@RobertoRDT RobertoRDT added the bug label Mar 7, 2023
@RobertoRDT RobertoRDT added this to the 0.99 milestone Mar 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants