Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can a function that returns tuple data return an Object instead of an Array? #4681

Open
luchenqun opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement. fixed/complete This Bug is fixed or Enhancement is complete and published. v6 Issues regarding v6

Comments

@luchenqun
Copy link

Ethers Version

6.11.1

Search Terms

tuple,object,array

Describe the Problem

struct Description {
    string moniker;
    string identity;
    string website;
    string securityContact;
    string details;
}

struct CommissionRates {
    uint256 rate;
    uint256 maxRate;
    uint256 maxChangeRate;
}

enum BondStatus {
    Unspecified,
    Unbonded,
    Unbonding,
    Bonded
}

struct Validator {
    address operatorAddress;
    string consensusPubkey;
    bool jailed;
    BondStatus status;
    uint256 tokens;
    uint256 delegatorShares;
    Description description;
    int64 unbondingHeight;
    int64 unbondingTime;
    Commission commission;
    uint256 minSelfDelegation;
}

  function validator(
      address validatorAddr
  ) external view returns (Validator calldata validator);

This is an interface I defined for querying validators based on addresses. The data returned from the query is as follows:

[
  "0x7a24464c2A92C3774f1C7b0FFCbeee759Fa9934E",
  "ckQp0mBGYUnbBf1v3PJC4nkdGDuSW2MYO5CazB83J+E=",
  false,
  "3",
  "100000000000000000000",
  "100000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  [
    "node0",
    "",
    "",
    "",
    ""
  ],
  "0",
  "0",
  [
    [
      "100000000000000000",
      "1000000000000000000",
      "1000000000000000000"
    ],
    "1712309039"
  ],
  "1"
]

However, returning data in the form of an Array is not very convenient for frontend usage. Is it possible to return the data in the form of an Object, like the following:

{
  "operatorAddress": "0x7a24464c2A92C3774f1C7b0FFCbeee759Fa9934E",
  "consensusPubkey": "ckQp0mBGYUnbBf1v3PJC4nkdGDuSW2MYO5CazB83J+E=",
  "jailed": false,
  "status": "Bonded",
  "tokens": "100000000000000000000",
  "delegatorShares": "100000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "description": {
    "moniker": "node0",
    "identity": "",
    "website": "",
    "securityContact": "",
    "details": ""
  },
  "unbondingHeight": 0,
  "unbondingTime": 0,
  "commission": {
    "rate": "100000000000000000",
    "maxRate": "1000000000000000000",
    "maxChangeRate": "1000000000000000000"
  },
  "minSelfDelegation": "1"
}

Code Snippet

import { ethers } from 'ethers';
import fs from 'fs-extra';
import path from 'path';

BigInt.prototype.toJSON = function () {
  return this.toString();
};

export const main = async () => {
  const { rpc, contracts, stakingAddress } = await fs.readJSON('../cfg.json');
  const { abi } = await fs.readJSON(path.join(contracts, 'staking/IStaking.sol/IStaking.json'));
  const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(rpc);

  // input params
  const validatorAddress = '0x7a24464c2A92C3774f1C7b0FFCbeee759Fa9934E';

  const staking = new ethers.Contract(stakingAddress, abi, provider);
  const validator = await staking.validator(validatorAddress);
  console.log('validator', JSON.stringify(validator, undefined, 2));
};

main();

Contract ABI

{
    "inputs": [
        {
            "internalType": "address",
            "name": "validatorAddr",
            "type": "address"
        }
    ],
    "name": "validator",
    "outputs": [
        {
            "components": [
                {
                    "internalType": "address",
                    "name": "operatorAddress",
                    "type": "address"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "string",
                    "name": "consensusPubkey",
                    "type": "string"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "bool",
                    "name": "jailed",
                    "type": "bool"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "enum BondStatus",
                    "name": "status",
                    "type": "uint8"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "uint256",
                    "name": "tokens",
                    "type": "uint256"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "uint256",
                    "name": "delegatorShares",
                    "type": "uint256"
                },
                {
                    "components": [
                        {
                            "internalType": "string",
                            "name": "moniker",
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        {
                            "internalType": "string",
                            "name": "identity",
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        {
                            "internalType": "string",
                            "name": "website",
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        {
                            "internalType": "string",
                            "name": "securityContact",
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        {
                            "internalType": "string",
                            "name": "details",
                            "type": "string"
                        }
                    ],
                    "internalType": "struct Description",
                    "name": "description",
                    "type": "tuple"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "int64",
                    "name": "unbondingHeight",
                    "type": "int64"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "int64",
                    "name": "unbondingTime",
                    "type": "int64"
                },
                {
                    "components": [
                        {
                            "components": [
                                {
                                    "internalType": "uint256",
                                    "name": "rate",
                                    "type": "uint256"
                                },
                                {
                                    "internalType": "uint256",
                                    "name": "maxRate",
                                    "type": "uint256"
                                },
                                {
                                    "internalType": "uint256",
                                    "name": "maxChangeRate",
                                    "type": "uint256"
                                }
                            ],
                            "internalType": "struct CommissionRates",
                            "name": "commissionRates",
                            "type": "tuple"
                        },
                        {
                            "internalType": "int64",
                            "name": "updateTime",
                            "type": "int64"
                        }
                    ],
                    "internalType": "struct Commission",
                    "name": "commission",
                    "type": "tuple"
                },
                {
                    "internalType": "uint256",
                    "name": "minSelfDelegation",
                    "type": "uint256"
                }
            ],
            "internalType": "struct Validator",
            "name": "validator",
            "type": "tuple"
        }
    ],
    "stateMutability": "view",
    "type": "function"
}

Errors

Can a function that returns tuple data return an Object instead of an Array?

Environment

node.js (v12 or newer)

Environment (Other)

no

@luchenqun luchenqun added investigate Under investigation and may be a bug. v6 Issues regarding v6 labels Apr 5, 2024
@ricmoo
Copy link
Member

ricmoo commented Apr 5, 2024

The object returned from a call is a Result object, which sub-classes Array (so result[0] works), but the class is also implemented using an ES6 proxy, so if you have a property in your struct called foo then result.foo also works.

There is also a result.toObject() return a normal object with properties set on it and a result,toArray() which will return a non-proxy bare Array.

I think that should do what you need?

@luchenqun
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your prompt reply. result.toObject() is very close to what I want. However, I found that the result returned by result.toObject() is as follows:

{
  "operatorAddress": "0x7a24464c2A92C3774f1C7b0FFCbeee759Fa9934E",
  "consensusPubkey": "ckQp0mBGYUnbBf1v3PJC4nkdGDuSW2MYO5CazB83J+E=",
  "jailed": false,
  "status": "3",
  "tokens": "100000000000000000000",
  "delegatorShares": "100000000000000000000000000000000000000",
  "description": [
    "node0",
    "",
    "",
    "",
    ""
  ],
  "unbondingHeight": "0",
  "unbondingTime": "0",
  "commission": [
    [
      "100000000000000000",
      "1000000000000000000",
      "1000000000000000000"
    ],
    "1712309039"
  ],
  "minSelfDelegation": "1"
}

Only the values corresponding to the keys in the first layer have been converted, while the second layer such as description and commission are still in array form. Do I have to recursively process the value corresponding to each key?

@ricmoo
Copy link
Member

ricmoo commented Apr 5, 2024

Ah yes. I do believe it isn’t recursive. There was a reason for that, which I cannot recall. I can likely add a recursive version, perhaps add an optional parameter to toObject(deep?: boolean)?

I think it had to do with certain ABI (which were popular) that do not include names for deeply nested structs. But an optional parameter seems safe.

Changing this issue to a feature request. :)

@ricmoo ricmoo added enhancement New feature or improvement. on-deck This Enhancement or Bug is currently being worked on. minor-bump Planned for the next minor version bump. next-patch Issues scheduled for the next arch release. and removed investigate Under investigation and may be a bug. labels Apr 5, 2024
@luchenqun
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your response. I think adding an optional parameter deep is a great design.

@ricmoo
Copy link
Member

ricmoo commented Apr 17, 2024

Added in v6.12.0. Try it out and let me know if you have any problems.

Thanks! :)

@ricmoo ricmoo closed this as completed Apr 17, 2024
@ricmoo ricmoo added fixed/complete This Bug is fixed or Enhancement is complete and published. and removed on-deck This Enhancement or Bug is currently being worked on. minor-bump Planned for the next minor version bump. next-patch Issues scheduled for the next arch release. labels Apr 17, 2024
@luchenqun
Copy link
Author

I just quickly tried it, and yes, the struct is working as expected for me now. However, there is still an issue with struct arrays. For example, with the following Solidity interface:

function validators(
    BondStatus status,
    PageRequest calldata pagination
) external view returns (Validator[] calldata validators, PageResponse calldata pageResponse);

When I call it using ethers like this:

const validators = await staking.validators(status, pageRequest);
console.log('validators', validators.toObject(true));

I get the following error.

node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/utils/errors.js:124
            error = new Error(message);
                    ^

Error: value at index ${ index } unnamed (operation="toObject()", code=UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION, version=6.12.0)
    at makeError (file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/utils/errors.js:124:21)
    at assert (file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/utils/errors.js:143:15)
    at file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/abi/coders/abstract-coder.js:135:13
    at Array.reduce (<anonymous>)
    at Result.toObject (file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/abi/coders/abstract-coder.js:134:28)
    at Proxy.<anonymous> (file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/abi/coders/abstract-coder.js:93:42)
    at file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/abi/coders/abstract-coder.js:142:35
    at Array.reduce (<anonymous>)
    at Result.toObject (file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/abi/coders/abstract-coder.js:134:28)
    at Proxy.<anonymous> (file:///Users/lcq/Code/ethos/precompile/node_modules/ethers/lib.esm/abi/coders/abstract-coder.js:93:42) {
  code: 'UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION',
  operation: 'toObject()',
  shortMessage: 'value at index ${ index } unnamed'
}

@ricmoo
Copy link
Member

ricmoo commented Apr 17, 2024

Ah yes... Because Arrays use an anonymous coder for their child... Looking into it.

@ricmoo ricmoo reopened this Apr 17, 2024
@ricmoo
Copy link
Member

ricmoo commented Apr 17, 2024

There isn't actually a (backwards compatible) way to detect if the type should be an array. In the future, I should have unpack return string | null | undefined, where null is unnamed, and undefined is "nameless" (such as an array). The change is quite simple, but breaks backwards compatibility.

For now, What do you think of this idea (inside toObject per child):

if (deep && child instanceof Result) {
  try {
    child = child.toObject(deep);
  } catch (error) {
    if (isError(error, "UNSUPPORTED_OPERATION") && error.operation === "toObject()") {
      child = child.toArray();
    } else {
      throw error;
    }
  }
}

This means that any Array will correctly get converted to an Array, but also any tuple with unnamed properties will get folded into an Array.

This may be what we actually want anyways, as it makes the method more robust against lossy ABI fragments.

However, to retain the top-level type of Record<string, any>, the top level must always be named. Perhaps in a future version the return type should be Record<string, ResultType> | Array<ResultType> (where ResultType is narrowed only to the types that Results can contain).

@luchenqun
Copy link
Author

I just tried this way, and I can convert each element inside the array to an Object.

const validators = await staking.validators(status, pageRequest);
// console.log('validators', validators.toObject());
for (const validator of validators[0]) {
  console.log('validator', validator.toObject(true));
}

But what confuses me is why iterate over validators[0] instead of iterating over validators directly?

@ricmoo
Copy link
Member

ricmoo commented Apr 17, 2024

I think it's because your return type is (Validator[] calldata validators, PageResponse calldata pageResponse), which has 2 values.

So (I think?) what you would really want is const [ validators, pageResponses ] = await staking.validators(status, pageReqquest)?

Might be more obvious if you had const result = await stacking.validators(...); const validators = result[0]; for (const validator of validators) { ... }.

@luchenqun
Copy link
Author

Sorry, it was my mistake. Your are completely correct. It should indeed be written like this:

const [validators, pageResponses] = await staking.validators(status, pageRequest);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement. fixed/complete This Bug is fixed or Enhancement is complete and published. v6 Issues regarding v6
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants