Skip to content

No labels!

There aren’t any labels for this repository quite yet.

low impact
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
medium difficulty
medium difficulty
medium effort
medium effort
Default level of effort
medium impact
medium impact
Default level of impact
must have eventually
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
must have
must have
Something we consider an essential part of Solidity 1.0.
needs design
needs design
The proposal is too vague to be implemented right away
needs investigation
needs investigation
nice to have
nice to have
We don’t see a good reason not to have it but won’t go out of our way to implement it.
outsourceable
outsourceable
Needs little knowledge about the code base and can be done by externals.
performance 🐎
performance :racehorse:
priority review
priority review
We want this get the review of this PR to a conclusion ASAP.
protocol design 🔮
protocol design :crystal_ball:
Potential changes to ABI, meta data, standard JSON
research
research
selected for development
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
should compile without error
should compile without error
Error is reported even though it shouldn't. Source is fine.
should have
should have
We like the idea but it’s not important enough to be a part of the roadmap.
should report better error
should report better error
Error is just badly reported. Should be a proper type error - source is not fine.
should report error
should report error
Compiles without errors but should not.
spam
spam
stale
stale
The issue/PR was marked as stale because it has been open for too long.
style guide
style guide
Modification of the Solidity Style Guide