Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reevaluate external libraries #191

Open
luxaritas opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Reevaluate external libraries #191

luxaritas opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
pending triage type: ergonomics Tooling, refactoring, etc

Comments

@luxaritas
Copy link
Member

luxaritas commented Jun 10, 2020

Because of the short time scale for the initial implementation, a number of external libraries have been pulled in. There are a number of them that fall into one or more of the following categories:

  • Very small
  • Better implemented another way
  • Not very popular
  • Not well supported
  • Don't have good typescript support
  • Don't have SSR support

We should walk through all our dependencies and vet each one, determining whether it should be kept, ditched, or replaced.

@luxaritas luxaritas added the type: ergonomics Tooling, refactoring, etc label Jun 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pending triage type: ergonomics Tooling, refactoring, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant