The iperf3 project is hosted on GitHub at:
This site includes the source code repository, issue tracker, and wiki.
The developer list for iperf3 is: iperf-dev@googlegroups.com. Information on joining the mailing list can be found at:
http://groups.google.com/group/iperf-dev
There is, at the moment, no mailing list for user questions, although a low volume of inquiries on the developer list is probably acceptable. If necessary, a user-oriented mailing list might be created in the future.
Before submitting a bug report, try checking out the latest version of the code, and confirm that it's not already fixed. Then submit to the iperf3 issue tracker on GitHub:
https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues
Note: Issues submitted to the old iperf3 issue tracker on Google Code (or comments to existing issues on the Google Code issue tracker) will be ignored.
New options (not necessarily complete, please refer to the manual page for a complete list of iperf3 options):
-V, --verbose more detailed output than before -J, --json output in JSON format -Z, --zerocopy use a 'zero copy' sendfile() method of sending data -O, --omit N omit the first n seconds (to ignore slowstart) -T, --title str prefix every output line with this string -F, --file name xmit/recv the specified file -A, --affinity n/n,m set CPU affinity (Linux and FreeBSD only) -k, --blockcount #[KMG] number of blocks (packets) to transmit (instead of -t or -n) -L, --flowlabel set IPv6 flow label (Linux only)
Changed flags:
-C, --linux-congestion set congestion control algorithm (Linux only) (-Z in iperf2)
Deprecated flags (currently no plans to support):
-d, --dualtest Do a bidirectional test simultaneously -r, --tradeoff Do a bidirectional test individually -T, --ttl time-to-live, for multicast (default 1) -x, --reportexclude [CDMSV] exclude C(connection) D(data) M(multicast) S(settings) V(server) reports -y, --reportstyle C report as a Comma-Separated Values
Also deprecated is the ability to set the options via environment variables.
The following problems are notable known issues, which are probably of interest to a large fraction of users or have high impact for some users, and for which issues have already been filed in the issue tracker. These issues are either open (indicating no solution currently exists) or closed with the notation that no further attempts to solve the problem are currently being made:
- UDP performance: iperf2/iperf3 are both only about 50% as fast as nuttcp in UDP mode. This is being investigated, but in the meantime, if UDP tests above 5Gbps are needed, using nuttcp is recommended. (Issue #55)
- Interval reports on high-loss networks: The way iperf3 is currently
implemented, the sender write command will block until the entire
block has been written. This means that it might take several
seconds to send a full block if the network has high loss, and the
interval reports will have widely varying interval times. A
solution is being discussed, but in the meantime a work around is to
try using a small block size, for example
-l 4K
. (Issue #125) - The
-Z
flag sometimes hangs on OSX. (Issue #129) - On OpenBSD, the server seems to require a
-4
argument, implying that it can only be used with IPv4. (Issue #108) - When specifying the TCP buffer size using the
-w
flag on Linux, the Linux kernel automatically doubles the value passed in to compensate for overheads. (This can be observed by using iperf3's--debug
flag.) However, CWND does not actually ramp up to the doubled value, but only to about 75% of the doubled value. Some part of this behavior is documented in the tcp(7) manual page. (Issue #145) - On some platforms (observed on at least one version of Ubuntu
Linux), it might be necessary to invoke
ldconfig
manually after doing amake install
before theiperf3
executable can find its shared library. (Issue #153)
There are, of course, many other open and closed issues in the issue tracker.
iperf3 version numbers use (roughly) a Semantic Versioning scheme, in which version numbers consist of three parts: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
The developers increment the:
- MAJOR version when making incompatible API changes,
- MINOR version when adding functionality in a backwards-compatible manner, and
- PATCH version when making backwards-compatible bug fixes.
Update the
README
andRELEASE_NOTES
files to be accurate. Make sure that the "Known Issues" section of theREADME
file is up to date.Compose a release announcement. Most of the release announcement can be written before tagging.
Starting from a clean source tree (be sure that
git status
emits no output):vi src/version.h # update the strings IPERF_VERSION and IPERF_VERSION_DATE vi configure.ac # update version parameter in AC_INIT vi src/iperf3.1 # update manpage revision date if needed vi src/libiperf.3 # update manpage revision date if needed git commit -a ./bootstrap.sh # regenerate configure script, etc. git commit -a git push ./make_release tag # this creates a tag in the local repo that matches the version.h version git push --tags # Push the new tag to the GitHub repo ./make_release tar # create tarball and compute SHA256 hash
Doing the above steps on CentOS 6 (with its somewhat older autotools / libtools suite) is preferred; newer systems generate
configure
andMakefile
scripts that tend to rebuild themselves rather frequently. It might be possible to address this problem (and graduate to newer autotools) by usingAC_MAINTAINER_MODE
but there's a fair amount of religion associated with this.Stage the tarball (and a file containing the SHA256 hash) to the download site. Currently this is located on
stats.es.net
.From another host, test the link in the release announcement by downloading a fresh copy of the file and verifying the SHA256 checksum.
Also verify (with file(1)) that the tarball is actually a gzipped tarball.
For extra points, actually try downloading, compiling, and smoke-testing the results of the tarball on all supported platforms.
Plug the SHA256 checksum into the release announcement.
Send the release announcement (PGP-signed) to these addresses:
Update the iperf3 Project News section of the documentation site to announce the new release (see
docs/news.rst
in the source tree) and deploy a new build of the documentation to GitHub Pages.