Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sample name not included in consensus fasta file #31

Open
avantonder opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Sample name not included in consensus fasta file #31

avantonder opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@avantonder
Copy link

Operating System

Other Linux (please specify below)

Other Linux

Redhat

Workflow Version

v1.1.1

Workflow Execution

Command line

EPI2ME Version

No response

CLI command run

nextflow run epi2me-labs/wf-bacterial-genomes --fastq data/fastq_pass/ --reference_based_assembly --reference GCF_900205735.1_N16961_v2_genomic.fna --sample_sheet samplesheet_epi2me.csv -profile singularity -c cambridge.config -resume

Workflow Execution - CLI Execution Profile

singularity

What happened?

The pipeline ran successfully but the consensus fasta files created by the pipeline have the reference name and basecaller model in the fasta header instead of the sample id. This is not particularly helpful for building alignments to create phylogenetic trees.

Relevant log output

grep ">" CTMA_1402.medaka.fasta

>NZ_LT906615.1 basecall_model=dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_sup@v4.2.0

Application activity log entry

No response

Were you able to successfully run the latest version of the workflow with the demo data?

other (please describe below)

Other demo data information

Not tested
@cjalder
Copy link

cjalder commented Apr 2, 2024

Hi @avantonder thanks for raising this issue. In your example what would you propose, something like the following:
>CTMA_1402 NZ_LT906615.1 basecall_model=dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_sup@v4.2.0?

@avantonder
Copy link
Author

@cjalder Yes, this would work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants