You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When producing samples using PMC for a problem that has e.g. a unitarity bound, with absolute limits on the size parameters, Meril and I currently face similar problems: The PMC does not easily converge. We therefore filter samples from a PMC run w/o application of the bounds.
Maybe a useful interface would be to create an "indicator" function or a filter that uses a second set of priors. Care needs to be taken that the 2nd set of priors does not include any informative priors, and that its absolute ranges are more strict than the original ones for all parameters.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
When producing samples using PMC for a problem that has e.g. a unitarity bound, with absolute limits on the size parameters, Meril and I currently face similar problems: The PMC does not easily converge. We therefore filter samples from a PMC run w/o application of the bounds.
Maybe a useful interface would be to create an "indicator" function or a filter that uses a second set of priors. Care needs to be taken that the 2nd set of priors does not include any informative priors, and that its absolute ranges are more strict than the original ones for all parameters.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions