New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
STEP and batteries using 2021 averages #6647
Comments
And I add one issue : are they double counted at production time and a second time when it is given back from storage? |
@florianscheidl you worked a bit on updating all of these, what is the status of that and is there anything I can do to help? |
@VIKTORVAV99 thanks for the consideration of the matter. But actually I think that the major problem is that emissions of the production are counted twice (one at the real electricity production time and two at the giving back to the network with the use of this average) while emissions of the batteries construction is not taken into account. Indeed, we should not consider average CO2 intensity averages but CO2 intensity of batteries with their CO2 cost against their number of cycles during their lifespan (giving the Wh distributed to the network). Same for STEPs |
Happy so see that you are picking this up. We did reprocessing for specific regions back when we updated the capacities. Since then, I haven't been working on this. |
I think that makes sense, I have a few projects going on myself that I need to finish up before starting on this but slack week should be perfect for this. |
Thank you for considering it but I am still worried by this double count of CO2 emissions for the production both at the production and when it leaves storage. |
When did this happen?
Constant
What zones are affected?
Zones with STEP and/or batteries
What is the problem?
The data used for the carbon intensity of STEPs and batteries is detailed as average 2021. Three matters are raised with that:
Maybe it was already answered but I am new to this github and quite ignorant about how to research informations there.
Many thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: