Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing Support for term range queries #8004

Open
lukapor opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 7 comments · May be fixed by #8175
Open

Missing Support for term range queries #8004

lukapor opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 7 comments · May be fixed by #8175
Labels

Comments

@lukapor
Copy link
Contributor

lukapor commented Dec 18, 2023

Only number and date range queries are supported by version 8.

@flobernd flobernd added the 8.x Relates to 8.x client version label Dec 22, 2023
@flobernd
Copy link
Member

I'm currently in the prgoress of implementing all missing endpoints and related features. This particular feature (term range queries) should be available afterwards as well.

@CasperWSchmidt
Copy link

@flobernd Any ETA on this? We're currently migrating from NEST because it's not working on .Net 8 and need the TermRangeQuery

@flobernd
Copy link
Member

@CasperWSchmidt I hope to finish the required work on the code generator around end of Q1. If you can't use NEST and the v8.* client in parallel on .NET8, one workaround would be using the low level transport and manually crafting JSON requests. However, arsing the response could be challenging. As an alternative, you could probably fork NEST and add support for net8 (which shouldn't be a lot of work). This is what I've done a lot in the past for libraries which are no longer maintained.

@CasperWSchmidt
Copy link

@flobernd We're on a very tight schedule for upgrading to .Net 8, so we've chosen not to have support for term range queries for now and add it later. The end of Q1 sounds reasonable enough to just wait for it to come :)

@CasperWSchmidt
Copy link

@flobernd any news on this?

@flobernd
Copy link
Member

Hi @CasperWSchmidt, as you've probably noticed, I was able to release the 8.13.x client in time. Afterwards I already started focusing on the bugs, but the list is long 🙂

It seems like this specific issue is related to the specification and not - like I originally thought - to the code generator. The TermsRangeQuery is not modelled there. I'm going to re-open issue until I come up with a fix.

@flobernd
Copy link
Member

flobernd commented May 7, 2024

Related to elastic/elasticsearch-specification#2545

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants