DRY versus AAA Ontology Design Question

[ghost]

I have an ontology design question. I think there is a conflict between “Don’t Repeat Yourself” and “Anyone can say Anything about Anything”. The following query produces 194 results when executed against the NQUADS format of a recent FIBO distribution:

select ?s ?g1 ?g2 ?p ?o where {
    graph ?g1 { ?s ?p ?o }
    graph ?g2 { ?s ?p ?o }
    filter(?g1!=?g2)
}

While a DESCRIBE query executed against the default graph produces all the triples that define the meaning of the subject, I wonder if it would be helpful if all the contributors to the meaning of a subject were made explicit everywhere the meaning was elaborated by use of rdfs:seeAlso leaving rdfs:isDefinedBy to delineate where specific parts of the meaning is defined?