[BUG] (a priori) Erroneous hierarchy for "qualsolid" [format:3610]

[M-casado]

Hi, I believe that the term "qualsolid" [format:3610] has the incorrect parental hierarchy based on its definition: "FASTQ format subset for Phred sequencing quality score data only (no sequences) for SOLiD data.".

If it does not contain indeed "sequences", I would argue the following hierarchy is wrong and it should not be included in "Sequence record format" [format:1919]. This last term is described as "Data format for a molecular sequence record.".

[matuskalas]

Thank you so much for your detailed report @M-casado, this indeed needs to be reviewed 🙏🏽

[rioualen]

Hello,

In order to address this issue I propose to do the following:

1. remove the "qual" nodes that are in the fastq-like branches (red strikes)
2. remove 1 intermediate node in "Format (by type of data) > Sequence quality report format (text) > qualsolid" (green strike)
3. Rename/map "Textual format > FASTQ-like format > qual" to "Textual format > FASTQ-like format > Sequence quality report format (text)" (purple strike)
4. Add "FASTQ-solid" as a broad synonym of qualsolid (blue notes)
5. Do the same with qual454, qualillumina and qualsolexa

What do you think about it @matuskalas ? If it's okay with you I can implement those changes myself in Protege.