You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm currently playing with your Helm charts and i think the current handling of certificates in the base chart is suboptimal.
The base chart always installs a production ClusterIssuer (even if there might already be one that should be used for theia) and assumes that a second, self-signed Issuer has to be installed as well. I guess this was implemented that way to simplify the dev setup, but for production use cases I think the certificate handling should be handled separately, of at least be configurable.
If you agree with my suggestion, I'd start implementing that and open an PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I agree that we should not force install the issuers, especially since we already allow using different issuers via the helm values.
So maybe having two additional values with which we can skip each of them would be great.
I would still like to have the option to install both issuers or either of them using our charts.
Hi everyone,
I'm currently playing with your Helm charts and i think the current handling of certificates in the base chart is suboptimal.
The base chart always installs a production
ClusterIssuer
(even if there might already be one that should be used for theia) and assumes that a second, self-signed Issuer has to be installed as well. I guess this was implemented that way to simplify the dev setup, but for production use cases I think the certificate handling should be handled separately, of at least be configurable.If you agree with my suggestion, I'd start implementing that and open an PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: