Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JGit Compatability with Jakarta EE10 #19

Open
ekennedy80 opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

JGit Compatability with Jakarta EE10 #19

ekennedy80 opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ekennedy80
Copy link

Description

Currently, JGit uses javax.* making it incompatible with newer jakarta.*.

Motivation

In order to allow other web applications that use JGit the ability to use newer jakarata libs, JGit needs to move away from javax to jakarta.

Alternatives considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@tomaswolf tomaswolf added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 5, 2024
@mchoubby
Copy link

mchoubby commented Apr 8, 2024

when will this enhancement be achieved please ? it's blocking us from upgrading to the last major version of spring boot

@davido
Copy link
Contributor

davido commented May 5, 2024

Here is the pending change to migrate to Jetty 11.0 and Servlet-API to 5.0: [1].

[1] https://review.gerrithub.io/c/eclipse-jgit/jgit/+/189213

@tomjo
Copy link

tomjo commented May 21, 2024

I see this change is merged ❤️ Is there a planning for the next release version?

@msohn
Copy link
Member

msohn commented May 21, 2024

JGit releases following the calendar of the Eclipse IDE simultaneous release,
see https://github.com/eclipse-simrel/.github/blob/main/wiki/Simultaneous_Release.md

JGit releases (existing and planned) are listed here https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.jgit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants