New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Versioning #888
Comments
I believe this issue would have been found before release if the release process involved writing release notes. Could that please be considered? |
It looks like we're now bumping the required JDK version to 17 in a 3.0.5 release to satisfy the updated Spring dependency that dependabot brought in: #900 I would reiterate that this is not something that typically goes into a patch release and would push for a version increment to 3.1.0 or 4.0.0. |
Related 3.0.5 PR: #931 |
We need to do a 3.1 (or 3.2?) anyway, to support things like Jakarta Annotations 3. (for now in a milestone version) |
Hi,
What versioning system does this project use?
The last patch release (3.0.4) was a gigantic update of what looks like every single dependency this project uses.
The updates were extensive enough that this project no longer compiles under JDK 11 despite that being set as the minimum version. I believe this is due to it pulling in Spring 6.x rather than 5.x. This presumably slipped through due to the CI also being updated to compile using JDK 17, meaning the published artefacts require also you to be using JDK 17.
The dependency updates also include an update to OSGi R7, which is what brings in the fairly substantial change that, unless explicitly specified not to, the manifests of the modules will now include import statements for JDK packages and expect them to be resolved.
My personal stance is that all of these updates should have gone into a 3.1.0 or 4.0.0 release, not what would typically be seen as a bug fix or service release. I suggest that the active dev branch version is updated appropriately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: