-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Confidence intervals for standardized mean differences in repeated measures #631
Comments
Regarding Regarding the supposedly larger deviations between Bellow I demonstrate this with a bootstrap simulation: Code
The slabs are the bootstrapped sampling distribution of the effect size (top - bootstrap accounting for nesting; bottom - bootstrap not accounting for nesting). The black spikes mark the CIs as returned by the various We can see:
|
Thanks for your reply. My point about d_b, d_av, and "just d" was incorrect, as your simulation results show. I did not take the correlations into account. I would prefer to give users a choice of which CI method to use for d_z and d_rm, but I can respect your idea of using different methods for different functions. |
The confidence intervals for the effect size of repeated measures calculated by the rm_d() function do not match the results of other existing functions.
For example, the following two outputs have matching point estimates but not matching confidence intervals.
The reason for the discrepancy is that rm_d() calculates confidence intervals by approximating the sample distribution with a normal distribution, while the other existing functions calculate confidence intervals using the non-central distribution method. I consider the non-central distribution method to be more accurate.
In addition, the results of the following functions should be consistent.
I would like the confidence intervals to be calculated in the same method consistently within the package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: