New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

forecast_variable field is redundant if we are just working with volumes #38

Open

e-lo opened this issue Dec 13, 2018 · 1 comment

Assignees

Labels

schema

Owner

e-lo commented Dec 13, 2018

From tester:

Since we were working on Volumes, I do not feel need to add Forecast_Variable field. This field has options as ridership, boardings, speed, etc.

e-lo assigned gregerhardt

Owner Author

e-lo commented Dec 13, 2018

Even if we just have volumes (which we don't need to be), we might have special volume types (hov, toll, etc) which would be useful.

e-lo added the schema label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment