Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to offer then recommendation based on the result? #9

Open
Jeriousman opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

How to offer then recommendation based on the result? #9

Jeriousman opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Jeriousman
Copy link

Jeriousman commented Apr 20, 2022

If I understood correctly, I see that pp in the result is the predicted probability of forgetting a word. So if pp is low, I should recommend a word associated with the pp as a user might have forgotten the word already. But from the result, I dont see associated word with pp. Then how can I recommend words to users?
And again, is my saying correct? (words with low pp values should be recommended)

Finally, I checked roughly the result and compared p (ground truth) and pp (prediction) and seemed to find that p and pp are quite not matching when they should. For example, when p is 0.0001 pp is 0.9999 and when p is 0.9999, pp is 0.0001. I saw this case quite often when I was skimming. But MAE shows it is very similar as your paper which means training is not broken. Is it normal that p and app are not so matching often? Should I still recommend repeating lexeme according to the pp values?

@Jeriousman
Copy link
Author

I guess I should just concat test set data with eval result and then find the lexeme?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant