Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LiveHealthChecks - Innovative system for real-time monitoring of API health checks #368

Open
12 of 18 tasks
VeritasSoftware opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
12 of 18 tasks
Assignees
Labels
project application project support Use this label to request support for an existing .NET Foundation project

Comments

@VeritasSoftware
Copy link

Project Name

Live Health Checks

License

MIT

Contributor

Shantanu Negi

Existing OSS Project?

No

Source Code URL

https://github.com/VeritasSoftware/LiveHealthChecks

Project Homepage URL

No response

Project Transfer Signatories

Description

A system for real-time monitoring of API health checks using SignalR web sockets.

Name

Shantanu Negi

Email

shantanu_negi@hotmail.com

GitHub Profile URL

https://github.com/VeritasSoftware

Committers

Shantanu Negi (VeritasSoftware)

Discord Ids

No response

Governance Model

At present, I am the only contributor.

CLA

  • If already an OSS project, was a Contribution License Agreement in place for contributions accepted?

How does the project check who has signed one?

No response

CLA Notification Alias

No response

Select the Project Transfer Agreement model

Contribution

Repository Layout

No response

Eligibility Criteria

  • The project is built on the .NET platform and/or creates value within the .NET ecosystem.
  • The project produces source code for distribution to the public at no charge.
  • The project's code is easily discoverable and publicly accessible (preferably on GitHub).
  • The project contains a build script that can produce deployable artifacts that are identical to the official deployable artifacts, with the exception of code signing (Exception may be granted for strong name keys, though strongly encouraged to be committed. Exception relies on OSS signing being in the build script for public builds).
  • When applicable, project must use reproducible build settings in its toolchain.
  • The project uses Source Link.
  • The project uses either embedded PDBs or publish symbol packages to NuGet (if applicable).
  • The project code signs their artifacts as appropriate.
  • The project organization has 2FA enabled. Requiring 2FA must be done as part of onboarding if not already enabled.
  • Libraries that are mandatory dependencies of the project are offered under a standard, permissive open source license which has been approved by the .NET Foundation (exceptions include a dependency that is required by the target platform where no alternative open source dependency is available such as the .NET Framework or a hardware specific library).
  • Committers are bound by a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) and/or are willing to embrace the .NET Foundation's CLA when the project becomes a Member.
  • The copyright ownership of everything that the project produces is clearly defined and documented.
  • The project has a public issue tracker where the status of any defect can be easily obtained.
  • The project has a published Security Policy.
  • The project has a home page which provides high level information about its status and purpose.
  • The project has a public communication channel where community members can engage with maintainers.
  • The project has a publicly available location where members can review and contribute to documentation.

PR Plan Summary

I know that this project is innovative & there is a market for this.
However, I am do not have the means to market it. My repository viewers are few.
So, .NET Foundation on-boarding will be beneficial.

Infrastructure Requirements Summary

No response

Additional Notes

No response

@VeritasSoftware VeritasSoftware added project application project support Use this label to request support for an existing .NET Foundation project labels Mar 14, 2024
This was referenced Mar 21, 2024
@VeritasSoftware
Copy link
Author

VeritasSoftware commented Apr 4, 2024

Hi,

I think this project has machine learning implications too.

For eg, your Application running on a machine,
can trap an error, and run the health check, in the error handler.

And, publish the health report to the Server, and on to Monitoring apps,
in real time.

You can also create custom health checks for particular errors.
And, hence are able to learn the internal state of your Application at the time.

you can see this section of the project readme to learn more.

@sbwalker
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your application. The Project Committee reviewed the application at a recent meeting based on the criteria outlined in the Charter (https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/projects?tab=readme-ov-file#criteria). Based on the current Activity metrics, the project does not yet meet the Activity requirements for becoming a Member project. However, the Project Committee is interested in getting a better understanding of the specific benefits or services you were hoping to receive by joining the .NET Foundation. If you are able to provide this additional context, we will be able to provide guidance on next steps.

@VeritasSoftware
Copy link
Author

VeritasSoftware commented May 10, 2024

The project is innovative, in that, there is nothing similar in the open source market.
And, it is very useful to the community. API/app health checks are very important.
This project enhances that.

I am hoping that the project will receive more viewers,
by being associated with the .NET Foundation.
Services like content amplification will help bring the project,
before the community.
This will really help the project gain popularity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
project application project support Use this label to request support for an existing .NET Foundation project
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants