New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extending Interface to Incorporate Models in Statsmodels #35
Comments
Hi Joseph -
We are willing to collaborate on this. Can we meet on a call to
discuss this?
Thanks,
Shashank
…On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 5:33 AM, Joseph Luchman ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @dominance-analysis <https://github.com/dominance-analysis>!
I am a fellow dominance analysis software developer who has mostly
focused, to date, on the Stata <https://github.com/jluchman/domin> and R
<https://github.com/jluchman/domir> software. I've been interested in
your project for some time and wanted to approach you all to see if you
were interested in collaborating to extend dominance-analysis' interface to
generalize it in an effort to be able to incorporate most models in the
statsmodels package.
Broadly, what I would propose is incorporating something like the *domir*
R package's R formula based approach that uses a formula interface to
select subsets of features but using the *patsy* formula structure for
which many models in Statsmodels have an API.
I anticipate it would be a reasonably straightforward extension of the
*domir* function to *patsy* formulas for selecting features as an
interface to statsmodels' formula API. From there, it would be a matter of
incorporating the architecture you all have developed in this package to
implement the dominance statistic computations and dominance designations.
I would be happy to expand more on what I am thinking if this suggestion
for an extension of the capabilities of the package is unclear.
Look forward to hearing from you all!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#35>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFLHYLV2W7NIANM6K6T2LTDX2Y45XANCNFSM6AAAAAA43GRPTU>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi Shashank, Pleased to hear it and would be glad to join a call to talk all this over.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi @dominance-analysis!
I am a fellow dominance analysis software developer who has mostly focused, to date, on the Stata and R software. I've been interested in your project for some time and wanted to approach you all to see if you were interested in collaborating to extend dominance-analysis' interface to generalize it in an effort to be able to incorporate most models in the statsmodels package.
Broadly, what I would propose is incorporating something like the domir R package's R formula based approach that uses a formula interface to select subsets of features but using the patsy formula structure for which many models in Statsmodels have an API.
I anticipate it would be a reasonably straightforward extension of the domir function to patsy formulas for selecting features as an interface to statsmodels' formula API. From there, it would be a matter of incorporating the architecture you all have developed in this package to implement the dominance statistic computations and dominance designations.
I would be happy to expand more on what I am thinking if this suggestion for an extension of the capabilities of the package is unclear.
Look forward to hearing from you all!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: