New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: Official Docker Image #4261
Comments
That is great that there will be an official Docker image! I am using this compose file with DokuWiki installed in a volume: What do you think about including compose file(s) into your repository? For normal users it is difficult to take care of backups in the Docker environment. I think it would be really useful to include the backup functionality in the official repository. Of course anything from my repository can be used. Regarding your Docker Image:
|
|
Update: the repository has been moved to the dokuwiki organization and first images have been published to docker hub. Please report any issues you might encounter at the docker repo: https://github.com/dokuwiki/docker/issues |
This is a follow up to #1896 and #3381.
My attempt in #3381 is IMO the most elegant solution. However the requirement of elevated permissions to be able to use an overlay file system makes this solution impractical for real world usage.
At @cosmocode we have been relying on the Bitnami image for a while to deploy DokuWiki instances in our Kubernetes cluster. However I am not super happy with that image. We encountered problems mostly when updating containers to new DokuWiki versions: with core plugins being stale (because they had been copied into the volume) and with Bitnami internal changes that were not correctly migrated on container renewal...
In an attempt to create an image we can use instead, I came up with https://github.com/cosmocode/docker-dokuwiki
My goals were:
The container should not:
All these things are better handled by properly composing multiple containers.
❓ First of all I would like to get comments on the container setup. I'm sure there are things that would be worth improving.
❓ Secondly, I wonder if it would be worth it to promote this setup to "official" status, by moving the repo to the @dokuwiki org and to auto build and publish the image on Docker hub.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: