Update minimum platforms for 1.15.0 to update Qt

[alamshafil]

I wanted to open this issue to discuss if should update minimum platform versions (Windows, macOS, Linux), which is a breaking change, to help update the Qt dependency.

According the the Qt website, Qt 5.15.x supports macOS >= 10.13 and Windows >= 7.
Qt 6.6 supports macOS >= 11 and Windows 10 (1809) or higher.

Updating the Qt dependency also requires new dependencies.

• Dependencies update:

  • libxcb 1.10 -> 1.14 (min for Qt 5.15.x is 1.11)
  • xcb_proto 1.10 -> 1.14.1
  • OpenSSL 1.0.2u -> 1.1.1w (latest) (min for Qt 5.15.x is 1.1.1)

• New Dependencies

  • libxcb_* 0.4.0 (needed for Linux Qt 5.15.x)

The Qt dependency update would cause the change in minimum platform support. While OpenSSL should support glibc 2.11, from the last time I attempted to update the Qt version I noticed symbol check failed on getauxval and getentropy.

It also might be helpful to do these dependencies updates, but I am not sure how it will effect the current Qt version.

[patricklodder]

• Qt 5.15 has some form of extended-LTS for a year and then we're on our own. I don't think it makes sense to port that in.
• OpenSSL is not needed for Qt anymore if we deprecate BIP70 fully, which imho we should, unless we get a million complaints from 1.14.7 users.

The other dependency updates we can deal with, but let's focus on Qt6.

The first step to get that in is to get rid of Qt4 conditionals.

[patricklodder]

I've been studying the Qt (LTS only, because non-LTS only has 1 year support) requirements a bit from the site @alamshafil mentioned above.

Version	End of Support	GCC	Windows	macOS
5.15	2023-05-26	9	7-11	10.13-12
6.2	2024-09-30	9	10-11	10.14-12
6.5	2026-03-30	11	10-11	11-13

So basically we can get:

• 6 months of 6.2 with not too much rework effort because it supports gcc-9, or
• 2 years of 6.5 with a tad more effort because it needs gcc-11

I don't think 5.15 is worth it for -10 months of support. After doing mad patching on pinned Qt source code, I'm convinced that 6.5 is the best option, because that means we don't have to worry about mad patching for 2 years. However, we'd need to check if we can get this to work for linux with glibc 2.31 as a base (current version for focal/bookworm - under RH 9.2, which iirc has 2.34)

I could - on top of #3466 and #3465 - investigate what is needed to just allow qt6 as a self-compile dependency for now. This would mean that we'd first make it work separate from depends, and only then start to mess around trying to make it all build deterministically.