Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance issue with getParent and maybe other things #628

Open
dantleech opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Performance issue with getParent and maybe other things #628

dantleech opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@dantleech
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed that if you map the @ParentDocument it seems that the parent node is eagerly loaded:

https://github.com/doctrine/phpcr-odm/blob/master/lib/Doctrine/ODM/PHPCR/UnitOfWork.php#L550

This is, I suppose, so that we know which class to create a proxy for, but obviously it almost defeats the point of creating a Proxy in the first place.

Doctrine ORM doesn't have this issue I guess. Any thoughts?

@lsmith77
Copy link
Member

lsmith77 commented Apr 9, 2015

well we can make it possible for the user to configure the class in the annotation optionally and then throw an exception on a mismatch.

@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented Apr 9, 2015

Oh indeed, why not. Though not suitable for all cases, often you want a
mixed tree - or you can go with orm right away. Could we offer to set a
closure instead of a proxy? Sort of super-lazy?
Am 09.04.2015 17:05 schrieb "Lukas Kahwe Smith" notifications@github.com:

well we can make it possible for the user to configure the class in the
annotation optionally and then throw an exception on a mismatch.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#628 (comment).

@sarcher
Copy link
Contributor

sarcher commented Aug 10, 2015

I ran into this today while exploring performance around changing the fetch depth in my particular use case. Since the depth is a session-based setting, and the additional query happens within the scope of the original operation, it inherits the same depth setting. This actually can lead to a potentially very costly re-fetch of the same data. (For example, query with a depth of 3 on a node, and a companion query is issued for the parent that also has a depth of 3, getting most of the same object graph).

A workaround to that particular issue is to zero out and then restore the session fetch depth in PrefetchHelper::prefetchHierarchy() for Jackalope or any other depth-supporting session, which at least prevents this case, making the eager fetch only a single node and usually very fast. Of course, that requires a code change here, and I'm not sure that's one worth making if another solution is coming (although I would definitely consider this case a bug worth fixing, one way or another).

The ORM actually suffers from a similar problem with one-to-one relations on the non-owning side. The mapping knows there may or may not be an entity on the other side, and has no way of knowing whether or not to create a proxy without actually executing a query, at which point it of course has the object (or a null value). It's generally a bad way to map anything anyway, but happens often with legacy schema. The ORM workaround is to force a partial load of the entity with a query hint, knowingly leaving that association as a null value rather than a proxy. Such a hint might be a less invasive solution here, though.

@dbu
Copy link
Member

dbu commented Aug 10, 2015 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants