Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Tree] [materializedPath] Deleting parent removes children when onDelete="restrict" #2776

Open
FrKevin opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@FrKevin
Copy link

FrKevin commented Feb 28, 2024

When onDelete="restrict", I don't know if this is the expected behaviour, but deleting the parent also deletes the children. I assumed I would get an SQL error, and the children are still in the database.

Example Entity

/**
 * @ORM\Entity(repositoryClass="Gedmo\Tree\Entity\Repository\MaterializedPathRepository")
 * @Gedmo\Tree(type="materializedPath")
 */
class Category
{
    /**
     * @ORM\Id
     * @ORM\GeneratedValue
     */
    private $id;

    /**
     * @Gedmo\TreePath
     * @ORM\Column(name="path", type="string", length=3000, nullable=true)
     */
    private $path;

    /**
     * @Gedmo\TreePathSource
     * @ORM\Column(name="title", type="string", length=64)
     */
    private $title;

    /**
     * @Gedmo\TreeParent
     * @ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Category", inversedBy="children")
     * @ORM\JoinColumns({
     *   @ORM\JoinColumn(name="parent_id", referencedColumnName="id", onDelete="restrict")
     * })
     */
    private Category $parent;

    /**
     * @Gedmo\TreeLevel
     * @ORM\Column(name="lvl", type="integer", nullable=true)
     */
    private $level;

    /**
     * @ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Category", mappedBy="parent")
     */
    private $children;

    public function getId()
    {
        return $this->id;
    }

    public function setTitle($title)
    {
        $this->title = $title;
    }

    public function getTitle()
    {
        return $this->title;
    }

    public function setParent(Category $parent = null)
    {
        $this->parent = $parent;
    }

    public function getParent()
    {
        return $this->parent;
    }

    public function setPath($path)
    {
        $this->path = $path;
    }

    public function getPath()
    {
        return $this->path;
    }

    public function getLevel()
    {
        return $this->level;
    }
}

Example of PHP Code

 $em = $this->getDoctrine()->getEntityManager();
 
 $category1 = (new Category())->setTitle('category_1');
 $category2 = (new Category())->setTitle('category_2')->setParent($category1);

$em->persist($category1);
$em->persist($category2);

$em->flush();

$em->remove($category1); 
$em->flush();

With this code I no longer get fatal postgresql error, $category1 and $category2 deleted even though parent is set to restrict delete.

Searching through the code, I found the function that I think is broken :

Here we delete all the children. We do not check if the parent is set to restrict delete.

@mbabker
Copy link
Contributor

mbabker commented Feb 29, 2024

IIRC the JoinColumn::$onDelete config is only used to configure the foreign key column in the database, the ORM doesn't use that to make any decisions about mapping relationships. Actually, the only place I can find the ORM using that information is in the UnitOfWork when it is determining the order of operations for DELETE statements, and it only takes into consideration "cascade" and "set null".

It does look like right now it's known the ORM might not work as expected with onDelete="restrict", see doctrine/orm#10783 for that.

So I don't think we have an actionable bug within this package at the moment, if something changes in the ORM around this situation then things can be updated here if need be.

@joosee7
Copy link

joosee7 commented May 3, 2024

It seems there might be some confusion here. While it's true that JoinColumn::$onDelete primarily configures the behavior of the foreign key column in the database, its impact extends beyond that. In MySQL, onDelete="restrict" should enforce that a referenced row cannot be deleted while it's still referenced by another table.

However, if this isn't being reflected as expected in the ORM, it could indeed be considered a bug. While the ORM may currently handle onDelete="cascade" and "set null" appropriately, the fact that onDelete="restrict" isn't behaving as anticipated could signify a bug.

The reported behavior should ideally align with database behavior for consistency and predictability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants