You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be useful to be able to run many figs in parallel, for instance to support a CI system similar in nature to drone.io (which fig appears to be partially, and thankfully, emulating in python).
One issue in particular is the fact that containers are removed when fig is run, to support workflows where the run configuration had changed (thanks @bfirsh).
I have no recommendations or patches, apologies!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A solution to this would be to make the project name configurable as a command line option (-p?). So for every instance of Fig you ran, you could give it a unique ID. E.g.:
$ fig up -d -p $BUILD_NUMBER
$ fig run web -p $BUILD_NUMBER ./test.sh
It would be useful to be able to run many figs in parallel, for instance to support a CI system similar in nature to drone.io (which fig appears to be partially, and thankfully, emulating in python).
One issue in particular is the fact that containers are removed when fig is run, to support workflows where the run configuration had changed (thanks @bfirsh).
I have no recommendations or patches, apologies!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: