Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chunking behavior in learning maps is unexpected and not documented #4384

Open
simonbate opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels

Comments

@simonbate
Copy link
Contributor

simonbate commented Feb 2, 2024

Expected Behavior

Learning maps should be chunked ONLY as how the author specifies.

Actual Behavior

<learning*Ref> elements in a learningObjectMap are chunked without allowing author to specify the behavior.

Possible Solution

  • This chunking behavior in learning maps should be optional. (It can be turned off with build-step.chunk, or in earlier OTs, by setting preprocess.chunk.skip, but this would mean turning off ALL chunking, which would be sub-optimal.)
  • This behavior should be documented. If it is, the doc is not very findable.
  • It would also be useful to know if there are any other topic types/elements that chunk "automatically."

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create DITA learning content using learningObjectMap.
  2. Create a learningObject in the map, add learningContentRef and learningPostAssessmentRef elements pointing to appropriate learning content.
  3. Build using transtype="HTML5"
  4. Output folder contains Chunk*.html files corresponding to each of the learning*Ref elements.

Copy of the error message, log file or stack trace

Environment

  • DITA-OT version: 3.6.1
  • Operating system and version: macOS
    (Linux, macOS, Windows)
  • How did you run DITA-OT? dita command
    (dita command, Ant, startcmd, oXygen, other editor, CMS, etc.)
  • Transformation type: HTML5
    (HTML5, PDF, custom, etc.)
@simonbate simonbate added the bug label Feb 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant