Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Run CI on our own systems #35

Open
Munksgaard opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Run CI on our own systems #35

Munksgaard opened this issue Jan 30, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
@WilliamDue

Comments

@Munksgaard
Copy link
Contributor

Now that we can actually test futhark-benchmarks on our own machines, perhaps we should do so in this repo as well?
@athas
Copy link
Member

athas commented Jan 30, 2023

Yes, sure. We just need to figure out how to make the runners listen to this repository as well. Fortunately, we have hired a mercenary to do things like that.

@WilliamDue WilliamDue linked a pull request Jan 30, 2023 that will close this issue
cmp-bench-json.py rewritten in Haskell (Issue #748) diku-dk/futhark#1860
Merged
@WilliamDue WilliamDue removed a link to a pull request Jan 30, 2023
cmp-bench-json.py rewritten in Haskell (Issue #748) diku-dk/futhark#1860
Merged
@WilliamDue
Copy link

I think runner groups could be used for this.

@Munksgaard
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think runner groups could be used for this.

That link is down, I think the new link is this one?

@WilliamDue
Copy link

I think runner groups could be used for this.

That link is down, I think the new link is this one?

Yes this looks correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@WilliamDue WilliamDue

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@athas @Munksgaard @WilliamDue