You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a conversation about brownfield sites validator we were unsure about how to refer to the content of a .csv register.
We recognise that a lot of people will be using spreadsheets to make and edit their .csv files, and in this context "cells" makes sense. "Fields" isn't right, whereas "values" make sense from a .csv perspective, but may not be a concept that people naturally think about.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've previously used "entries" as well but we didn't feel this was right. "Values" does seem more reflective of what it is given we are asking for data to be provided in CSV files. Lets see how it tests.
colmjude
added a commit
to digital-land/brownfield-sites-validator
that referenced
this issue
Nov 25, 2019
In a conversation about brownfield sites validator we were unsure about how to refer to the content of a .csv register.
We recognise that a lot of people will be using spreadsheets to make and edit their .csv files, and in this context "cells" makes sense. "Fields" isn't right, whereas "values" make sense from a .csv perspective, but may not be a concept that people naturally think about.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: