Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Player's spells damage player's golem #4352

Open
glebm opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #6881 or #7010
Open

Player's spells damage player's golem #4352

glebm opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #6881 or #7010

Comments

@glebm
Copy link
Collaborator

glebm commented Apr 6, 2022

latest master - 30374b7

@glebm glebm added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 6, 2022
@ikonomov
Copy link
Contributor

ikonomov commented Apr 7, 2022

When you move your cursor over a golem it is not highlighted like other monsters, but every single attack in the game can damage it. This includes melee damage, arrows (using shift) and spells. It would be really nice if we can have the golem be immune to player's attacks or have it behave like other players, being able to get damage by ranged attacks when player ranged attacks damage toggle is on in the .ini.

@glebm glebm changed the title Chain lightning targets and damages player's golem Player's spells damage player's golem Apr 7, 2022
@glebm glebm removed the bug Something isn't working label Apr 7, 2022
@glebm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

glebm commented Apr 7, 2022

I've removed the bug label for now as I'm not sure if this is intended or not

@ikonomov ikonomov linked a pull request Dec 29, 2023 that will close this issue
@kphoenix137
Copy link
Collaborator

Chain lightning crawl table accepting Golem as a valid target sounds like a bug, however I don't think spells damaging the Golem is a bug. However a fix such as ikonomov's could be considered a great QoL feature. I think this issue should rather only be closed with the spells auto targeting Golem is solved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants