You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having a general getter in the C-API would allow to retrieve values from opaque types. Since the actual type is unknown, the storage location the value should be written to must be passed as void*, as safety measure a positive integer of the available number of bytes can be passed (in case NULL is passed we assume void* has enough memory to hold any result). An error is created if the key does not correspond to any entry or if the required memory is larger than the available.
Could be a solution to peek into the damping parameters if created by method name, cc Lori @loriab. Not sure whether a generic setter is in-scope for dftd4 at the moment. Thanks to Miguel @steinmig for the suggestion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Having a general getter in the C-API would allow to retrieve values from opaque types. Since the actual type is unknown, the storage location the value should be written to must be passed as
void*
, as safety measure a positive integer of the available number of bytes can be passed (in caseNULL
is passed we assumevoid*
has enough memory to hold any result). An error is created if the key does not correspond to any entry or if the required memory is larger than the available.A possible API could be given provided with
Could be a solution to peek into the damping parameters if created by method name, cc Lori @loriab. Not sure whether a generic setter is in-scope for
dftd4
at the moment. Thanks to Miguel @steinmig for the suggestion.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: