Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'Creating a trigger' link links back to itself #34

Open
annashipman opened this issue Apr 21, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

'Creating a trigger' link links back to itself #34

annashipman opened this issue Apr 21, 2013 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@annashipman
Copy link
Member

On https://www.behabitual.com/add-habit/reminder/, the link (ie. creating a trigger) is to https://www.behabitual.com/add-habit/reminder/. I think the plan here was to have that link to some SCIENCE, but until we have said SCIENCE, shall we remove the link?

I will just do that unless anyone objects...?

@jaylett
Copy link
Member

jaylett commented Apr 21, 2013

He calls them cues not triggers, but how about this flowchart from Duhigg? He has a narrative discussing it as well (an appendix from the book, I think).

@annashipman
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I think the flowchart is good.
Now then, at the risk of opening up the can of worms again - should we change our terminology from trigger to cue so that the link makes sense?

@annashipman
Copy link
Member Author

I think we probably should. But since we have left the fort I assume it is no longer up to me to make these decisions :)

@jaylett
Copy link
Member

jaylett commented Apr 22, 2013

I'd be happy to change the terminology. I'd wait a couple of days, see if anyone objects :)

On 22 Apr 2013, at 19:02, Anna Shipman notifications@github.com wrote:

I think we probably should. But since we have left the fort I assume it is no longer up to me to make these decisions :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

devfort.com - spacelog.org - +44 7976 212023

@ghost ghost assigned annashipman May 9, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants