Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: support Routescan-based explorers #89

Open
iJaack opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Feature request: support Routescan-based explorers #89

iJaack opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@iJaack
Copy link

iJaack commented Dec 5, 2023

Routescan is a block explorer platform.

It currently hosts many Single and Ecosystem Explorers, of which fully supported are:

Routescan offers two types of APIs:

We'd like to request integration for Routescan and, specifically, for the explorers mentioned above.

I'm available for further questions.

@krzkaczor
Copy link
Member

@iJaack thanks for this proposal.

One idea to implement it is simply to support providing etherscan like API URL (and secret?) as query parameter. This way many other explorers would work out of the box.

This requires probably further research.

@iJaack
Copy link
Author

iJaack commented Dec 5, 2023

Hi @krzkaczor thank you for the prompt response. We currently support all the Etherscan endpoints, so it should be pretty easy. Let me know if you need other input from us :)

@iJaack
Copy link
Author

iJaack commented Dec 6, 2023

@krzkaczor specifically this ones: https://routescan.io/documentation/etherscan-compatibility/contracts

We already support Snowtrace: https://snowtrace.deth.net/address/0x6e84a6216eA6dACC71eE8E6b0a5B7322EEbC0fDd

But you'd need to enable support from your side for the other chains as well.

We aim to support 100 EVM chains by end of 2024, and they'll all have this same explorer type.

LMK

@iJaack
Copy link
Author

iJaack commented Jan 22, 2024

@krzkaczor any feedback here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants