Standardization of rule name #3448
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
There are also 2 rules with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I completely agree. We need to review all our rules and unify the naming. And create a guide so the new rules can follow some guidelines. And something similar with the configurations. We should do this work before 2.0 so we know the renaming that we want and the apply it once we are ready to release it. #2586 is related with this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not a fan of doing this for several reasons as I also mentioned in the linked issue. Didn't we already discuss this through?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There are 10 rules with
Unnecessary
and 5 rules withRedundant
in their names, we should standardize them so that those code simplification rules are in vicinity in the YAML config.Note: I discovered this when I thought
RedundantHigherOrderMapUsage
is #3341.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions