Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI Suggestion: merge all parliament views, use filters instead #1605

Open
justcomplaining opened this issue Feb 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@justcomplaining
Copy link

justcomplaining commented Feb 19, 2024

End-user suggestion:

Especially if Democracy is moving into a multi-level direction with local, state, federal and European level all part of the app, the per-parliament-per-legislature approach will quickly become hard to navigate. I would instead suggest migrating into a feature first, data source second approach, where there's only one list of e.g. laws/motions, candidates/members of parliament or agreement/wahl-o-meter with well-structured and flexible filtering options.

This would make it possible to e.g. get a value of agreement with a political party or person across all levels and time frames as well as general agreement with parliaments on all or specific levels or such interesting things as general agreement with female/male politicians etc.

For laws/motions, a user could get e.g. a list of all current motions across all levels relevant for them (e.g. both a federal law and a local motion on their city's program on support for theatres etc.)

I suspect it won't be easy to implement as data structure might vary across levels and legislatures. If it's somehow possible to do it, it would be highly beneficial.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant