Before, update sending might be delayed due to rate limits and later merged into large
messages. This is undesirable for apps that want to send large files over WebXDC updates because the
message with aggregated update may be too large for actual sending and hit the provider limit or
require multiple attempts on a flaky SMTP connection.

So, don't aggregate updates if the size of an aggregated update will exceed the limit of 100
KiB. This is a soft limit, so it may be exceeded if a single update is larger and it limits only the
update JSON size, so the message with all envelopes still may be larger. Also don't send any updates
together with the WebXDC instance to not complicate the code, the only downside is sending one
message more when resending or forwarding WebXDC instances.

Before, update sending might be delayed due to rate limits and later merged into large
messages. This is undesirable for apps that want to send large files over WebXDC updates because the
message with aggregated update may be too large for actual sending and hit the provider limit or
require multiple attempts on a flaky SMTP connection.

So, don't aggregate updates if the size of an aggregated update will exceed the limit of 100
KiB. This is a soft limit, so it may be exceeded if a single update is larger and it limits only the
update JSON size, so the message with all envelopes still may be larger. Also don't send any updates
together with the WebXDC instance when resending it to not complicate the code, the only downside is
sending one message more.

Before, update sending might be delayed due to rate limits and later merged into large
messages. This is undesirable for apps that want to send large files over WebXDC updates because the
message with aggregated update may be too large for actual sending and hit the provider limit or
require multiple attempts on a flaky SMTP connection.

So, don't aggregate updates if the size of an aggregated update will exceed the limit of 100
KiB. This is a soft limit, so it may be exceeded if a single update is larger and it limits only the
update JSON size, so the message with all envelopes still may be larger. Also don't send any updates
together with the WebXDC instance when resending it to not complicate the code, the only downside is
sending one message more.

Before, update sending might be delayed due to rate limits and later merged into large
messages. This is undesirable for apps that want to send large files over WebXDC updates because the
message with aggregated update may be too large for actual sending and hit the provider limit or
require multiple attempts on a flaky SMTP connection.

So, don't aggregate updates if the size of an aggregated update will exceed the limit of 100
KiB. This is a soft limit, so it may be exceeded if a single update is larger and it limits only the
update JSON size, so the message with all envelopes still may be larger. Also don't send any updates
together with the WebXDC instance when resending it to not complicate the code, the only downside is
sending one message more.