Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

my question is: this NEAT algorithm works well on XOR-experiment(2 input and 2 output), but I use it on a 3-input function, it works less efficient than XOR-experiment. #7

Open
luzd19 opened this issue Jul 3, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@luzd19
Copy link

luzd19 commented Jul 3, 2020

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to '...'
  2. Click on '....'
  3. Scroll down to '....'
  4. See error

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@luzd19
Copy link
Author

luzd19 commented Jul 3, 2020

so how can this algorithm be scaled up to function with more input node, not only the XOR-function ?

@ddehueck
Copy link
Owner

Sorry, this slipped by me. To answer your question, this method inherently does not scale well. Any growth to the input to the network affects the entire population which means we have a growth on the order of population_size * network_size.

However, if this issue refers to something like it takes an unreasonable amount of time on a toy problem like the XOR problem but with only 3 inputs then please provide the details and I may be able to help from there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants