Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DDD iterative way #19

Open
ksouf opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

DDD iterative way #19

ksouf opened this issue Aug 19, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@ksouf
Copy link

ksouf commented Aug 19, 2020

Hi Crew
I was thinking about iteratively using model processing.
I think is better to add when to do it also if we are in an agile context.
what do you think?
PS: I can help if you're open to it.

@NTCoding
Copy link
Member

Hi @ksouf,

I agree that modelling should be iterative and we've put a few sign posts and warning in the documentation trying to advise people to not just model as a single process. If you have some ideas about how we can improve that messaging that would be great.

How to apply these steps iteratively/continuously as an agile process seems like a good area to focus on. Feel free to outline your ideas in here or create a draft PR.

Thanks

@mploed
Copy link
Contributor

mploed commented Apr 7, 2021

Isn't this issue addressed with our new overview image?

@ksouf
Copy link
Author

ksouf commented Apr 8, 2021

yes it is but not in the way i expected :)

@mploed
Copy link
Contributor

mploed commented Apr 8, 2021

Maybe you want to share your expecations / ideas?

@ksouf
Copy link
Author

ksouf commented Apr 9, 2021

Sure sorry for the late response.
Here what I think : for the first iteration (understand/discover). in an itrative way we should get as fast as possible to coding so we can get a feedaback as much as possible. i don't thin it's a wise idea to iterate only on understand discover.
To give an example and be more specific i was thinking on somthing that Tobias Goeschel : Domain Prototyping
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDT5PKIYsT0
the thing that feels dangerous is doing it in waterfall way. I mean it 's better than it was before but we can make it even better ;)

Like i said i'm open to help if you'd like to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants